Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and
Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university
appointments and is Contributing Editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal.
His columns are at www.paulcraigroberts.org.
...
The
problem with reading a book to learn economics that is taught in the
universities and practiced in Washington is that economics is now a highly
formalized subject based on abstract models and assumptions and has been
mathematized. It is not that the subject is totally useless and without any
applicability to real world problems. ... some of the tools and
understanding provided are outdated and incorrect.
...
economists assume that man-made
capital is a perfect substitute for nature's capital. This assumption
implies that there are no finite environmental limits to infinite economic
growth. ... Economists have almost universally confused jobs offshoring with
free trade.
...
My
advice to readers who wish to develop economic comprehension is to begin
with the outside-the-box economists who are addressing real issues. For
example, Herman E. Daly and John B. Cobb...
...
The
Bubble and Beyond lets readers see how economic ideas developed in ways that
leave economists unable to perceive the real character of the problems that
are challenging them. Trapped in the matrix that they have constructed for
themselves, economists are unable to devise solutions.
2-4-8 Response
Washington: Fix the Economy or Die Trying
I enjoyed hearing what I suspected about economists -
that some “live in the artificial reality of [academics] or shill for
corporations and Wall Streetâ€. My own background with psychology and law
reveals that these professionals, like economists, may be “trapped in the
matrix that they have constructed for themselves, … unable to devise
solutionsâ€. When it comes to the hybrid specialty of tax reform it is near
impossible to find an advocate that can think out-of-the-box and put aside
professional and political prejudice. Washington’s lack of serious study of
“all†tax reform options is unconscionable. Given the scope and magnitude of
our economic malaise, this scholarship should be pushed with the effort of
the 1939 Manhattan Project.
I expect my representatives in Washington to fix the
economy or die trying.
Is it too much to expect congress to consider a value
added tax to reduce the corporate tax rate (as is used by every developed
country in the world)? A 4% VAT would permit the corporate tax rate to be
reduced to 8% and eliminate any need for a territorial tax system.
Should congress at least consider replacing payroll
taxes with a 2% net wealth tax (excluding $15, 000 cash and retirement
funds)? This change alone would create millions of jobs and stabilize Social
Security and Medicare for generations. It is tough medicine but it would fix
the most important economic problems of our country. A wealth tax also
provides a healthy negative reinforcement (“use it or lose itâ€) to encourage
productive use of capital (rather than buying a second yacht, putting gold
in a safe, opening a foreign bank account, etc.).
Lastly, does congress appreciate the fact that using
net wealth and consumption to broaden the tax base permits reductions in the
individual income tax rate to 8% and elimination of capital gains, estate
and gift taxes? Together these changes encourage maximum business
development.
Let us know at www.TaxNetWealth.com if you can identify
a logical, legal or economic reason why this 2-4-8 Tax Blend would not
produce a sustainable economic recovery as promised. Otherwise let your
representatives in Washington know that the right blend of taxes can create
jobs and restore wealth and a stable economy without government spending.
Eugene Patrick Devany, JD, MPA
|