ii iv viii
Logo3 Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

NEW - In 2016 the 2-4-8 Tax Blend will become 2-4-8 Tax Choice
The "choice" would allow all taxpayers to choose an income tax rate between 8% and 28% paired with a net wealth tax rate of 2% going down to zero. Wealth taxes paid would reduce Estate and Gift taxes (also set at 28%). This would encourage wealthy individuals to pay some net wealth taxes as a form of inexpensive life insurance.
  Wealth
0%
0.5%
1%
1.5%
2%

Income
28%
23%
18%
13%
8%

Business
C - Corp
4% VAT
8% Income
   


CNBC, Feb. 27, 2012
Warren Buffet would accept a tax on a person's total wealth:
“… I’d Buy Up Millions of Single-Family Homes If I Could"
by Alex Crippen, Photo by David G
rogan

Alex Crippen is an Executive Producer at CNBC and CNBC.com. He holds a degree in economics from Wesleyan University. He writes a summary of an interview given to Becky Quick (and Joe Kernan via remote) on CNBC's Squawk Box:

Buffett on Taxes

... On taxes, Buffett says it's a myth that U.S. corporations are paying anything close to a 35 percent tax rate and maintains those taxes are not "strangling" American competitiveness. He dismisses suggestions by critics that if he wants the super-rich to be taxed at a higher rate then he should write a check and make a voluntary donation to the Treasury. Buffett responds that contributions aren't going to solve the massive debt problem facing the U.S.

... He says it is a "travesty" that everyone else is being asked to make sacrifices but not America's most wealthy people.

... While he would accept Joe Kernen's suggestion for a tax on a person's total wealth, he says he doesn't think that's the best way to go, in part because it's hard to value assets like farms. ...


2-4-8 Response: Buffett on Wealth Tax

It is very big news to learn that Warren Buffet, “would accept Joe Kernen's suggestion for a tax on a person's total wealth”. I sponsor www.TaxNetWealth.com which advocates a broad tax base by taxing individual and foreign-owned net wealth at 2% (above a $15,000 exemption), retail sales at 4% and income at 8%. It would yield $2.6 trillion – ($400 billion more than FY 2010 federal revenue).


Rich and poor would pay the same tax rate. Event-based taxes from capital gains, estate and gift taxes would not be necessary. The concurrent elimination of payroll taxes for Medicare and social security (-to be funded from general funds) and a significant reduction of the corporate income tax rate to 8% should merit near universal support of the 2-4-8 Tax Blend from social liberals and business conservatives alike.


Corporations would feel less of a need to influence politicians once tax incentives are off the table. How would an 8% corporate income tax affect jobs and the economy? Those answers are better left to your talents and dreams for a brighter future.


Eugene Patrick Devany, JD, MPA

Note: The above response is brief due to the 1100 character limitation on CNBC.com. I believe Mr. Buffett's position was forshowed in Ralph Nader's book, Only the Super-Rich Can Save Us.

After the article was published CNBC published the transcript of the show which includes the following sections in regard to wealth:

BUFFETT: We have a healthy economy except for housing, but housing is such a big factor. Housing was 22 trillion or so of America's 60 trillion of wealth a few years back. And when that goes— gets whacked and is held on leverage with mortgages ...

JOE: Because that's how these — that's how these people are — to just like put a, what do you, like a surtax or something, that — or we can do that. I've asked you why can't we just tax you at 10 percent of your wealth and that didn't go over very well. If you had a 10 percent of all this wealth would bring in quite a bit of money, too. We'd get — I figure we get about 5 billion from you alone, right?

BUFFETT: Yeah, that's true and actually, you know, it's been — wealth tax is tough to enforce. I mean, very hard to say what, you know, what every farm is worth or you know, every business, private business is worth. I don't — I don't particularly favor a wealth tax, but I would not — I would have no objection to it. I mean, if 10 percent of my wealth and 10 percent of everybody's wealth went to the government, I don't think that's the best system, but...

Later in the day there was a blog in the Wall Street Journal about Mr. Buffett's comments on housing which resulted in a further 2-4-8 Response:

On CNBC Mr. Buffett said, "We have a healthy economy except for housing, but housing is such a big factor. Housing was 22 trillion or so of America's 60 trillion of wealth a few years back. And when that goes— gets whacked and is held on leverage with mortgages ..." In the same interview he said that he would buy up millions of single family homes if he could and further said he is open to a net wealth tax. This fox knows that the housing market (and his investments) would rebound if mortgage principal were used to offset assets in computing a net wealth tax and income tax rates were reduced to permit real saving. A wealth tax would be a much better boost for housing than the mortgage interest deduction on the income tax. Many politicians and economists are seriously considering the 2-4-8 Tax Blend. ...

 

 

 
    Skip Navigation LinksHome > News and Resourses > NEWS Jan-Mar 2012 > CNBC: Buffett on Wealth Tax

photo by CNBC David Grogan

Spread the word: Please let Congress know you want them to consider the 2-4-8 Tax Blend by simply tweeting "TaxNetWealth.com" or by copying any basic description and sending, faxing, or emailing it to at least one representative from each political party. Many representatives will only accept email through their individual websites.

Copyright 1985 to 2015 by Eugene Patrick Devany